Nooface
search Nooface:
 
In Search of the Post-PC Interface
 
Nooface
- Home
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Journals
- Messages
- Topics
- Contact

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story


Resources
- 3D User Interfaces
- Archives

 
IBM Should Have Innovated Rather Than Selling Off PC Business
posted by Editor on Monday December 27, @07:16PM
User Interface Experts In this editorial in the Wall Street Journal, David Gelernter argues that IBM should have made an effort to innovate on the design of PCs rather than selling off its PC business to Lenovo. While IBM appears to have concluded that PCs have reached a plateau, he argues that plenty of room for innovation remains, pointing out that cars were at an equivalent maturity stage as PCs in the early 1920's, airplanes in the late 1920's, and televisions in the 1970's. Many functions that should be built into PCs are available only as options, or not at all. Drawing on his familiar appeals for simplicity, Gelernter reveals several possible directions for improving the PC experience, including transparent information sharing, which would allow users to start work in one location and finish it in another.

Innovative Computer Input Solutions

 

 
Nooface Login
Nickname:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Go Create One. A user account will let you customize the site's content according to your preferences. It will also allow you to moderate the comments of other users.

Related Links
  • Wall Street Journal
  • David Gelernter
  • selling off
  • Lenovo
  • simplicity
  • More on User Interface Experts
  • Also by Editor
  • 'IBM Should Have Innovated Rather Than Selling Off PC Business' | Login/Create an Account | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    Click REPLY To Post Comment
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Better to start over (Score:1)
    by Croqueteer on Wednesday December 29, @11:37AM EST (#1)
    (User #642 Info)
    My guess is that IBM may be doing just that. The Cell architecture looks far more interesting than the old 8088 approach, and it has quite a few companies looking to innovate around it including Sony, MS, Toshiba, perhaps Apple with their strong relationship with IBM. This may be an opportunity for IBM to lose the low margin baggage that the PC business has become. Remember that IBM is still one of the few companies that has the ability to take the risk of developing a new platform. It is certainly time for a change.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    I'm not a robot like you. I don't like having disks crammed into me... unless they're Oreos, and then only in the mouth. -- Fry

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]