Nooface
search Nooface:
 
In Search of the Post-PC Interface
 
Nooface
- Home
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Journals
- Messages
- Topics
- Contact

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story


Resources
- 3D User Interfaces
- Archives

 
Cramming Speech Recognition Software Into PDAs
posted by Editor on Thursday October 11, @09:17AM
Speech & Sonic Interfaces This article in today's New York Times (free registration required) reveals some efforts going on to bring speech recognition software to handheld computers. This is, of course, particularly challenging since handhelds trade off processing capability for size and power consumption, and accurate speech recognition is notoriously compute-intensive. The article discusses IBM's Personal Speech Assistant (PDF) and Voice Signal's ELVIS, which can be used to dictate email messages to Compaq's iPaq.

Recreating The Real World In Virtual Space | Open Source Stroke Translation Library  >

 

 
Nooface Login
Nickname:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Go Create One. A user account will let you customize the site's content according to your preferences. It will also allow you to moderate the comments of other users.

Related Links
  • New York Times
  • Personal Speech Assistant
  • ELVIS
  • iPaq
  • More on Speech & Sonic Interfaces
  • Also by Editor
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    System Requirements for Dragon Naturally Speaking (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 11, @09:26PM EST (#1)
    When I wrote a paper on speech-driven interfaces in 1998, I dictated the first paragraphs using Dragon Naturally Speaking on a pentium 166 with 64MB of RAM. The iPaq runs a 206Mhz StrongArm processor, and some models have 64MB of memory (though not all available for runtime applications).

    It doesn't seem an incredible stretch to get OK recognition on a handheld. Of course, we've seen how successful uptake of speech-driven software has been [not very] - 95% accuracy still means making corrections every 20 words. Speaking at 160 words a minute that's 8 mistakes per minute to fix.

    In the near term, I think dedicated applications (like speech driven menuing) that only have to recognize words within a relatively small set are more useful, since they can get 99.9% accuracy.
    Is dictation a red herring? (Score:1)
    by misuba on Friday October 12, @12:45PM EST (#2)
    (User #118 Info)
    There are already little cell phones, with pathetic computing power compared even to low-end PDAs, that can interpret and obey one-word voice commands (to call a particular number, stuff like that). It seems to me like there's a real need for that in PDAs and niche-purpose information appliances. Think webpads and dashboard navigators.

    But is dictation something people really want or need from PDAs? I dunno... maybe people want to treat their PDA like a microcassette recorder? Then hand off the error-ridden transcription to an assistant, the way they would any microcassette, and have the assistant correct the PDA's transcription rather than transcribe from scratch? That's kinda interesting... would it really save anyone any time or money, though... hmm. I'm not sold just yet.

    I'm not a robot like you. I don't like having disks crammed into me... unless they're Oreos, and then only in the mouth. -- Fry

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]